4.7 Article

High Spatial Resolution Electrochemical Microscopic Observation of Enhanced Charging under Bias at Active Sites of N-rGO

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 3502-3507

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c03237

关键词

hydrogen evolution reaction; N-doped graphene; spatial observation; charge density; active sites

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874069, 21974060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent breakthrough demonstrates that the activation free energy decreases with the oxidative charge stored at the catalyst, shedding light on the balance between chemistry and bias in electrocatalysis. By isolating non-faradic and faradic currents in SECCM imaging, researchers successfully mapped charge accumulation and electrochemical activity with high resolution. The observation of enhanced charging under bias at active sites of N-doped graphene oxide in the hydrogen evolution reaction provides direct evidence to support the proposed mechanism, presenting valuable insights for the design of efficient HER catalysts.
Recent breakthrough reveals that the activation free energy decreases with the amount of the oxidative charge stored at the catalyst, which gives an insight into the role of chemistry vs bias in electrocatalysis. In this study, non-faradic and faradic currents from the total currents in the image of scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM) are isolated to realize the mapping of charge accumulation and electrochemical activity with a resolution of similar to 135 nm. Enhanced charging under bias is observed at the active sites of N-doped graphene oxide (N-rGO) with high electrochemical activity in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), providing direct evidence to support the mechanism as mentioned above. This established electrochemical imaging method and the collected result could provide more effective information about the electrochemical mechanism of the HER performance, which is significant for the design of high HER catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据