4.7 Article

Complex Structure of Molten NaCl-CrCl3 Salt: Cr-Cl Octahedral Network and Intermediate-Range Order

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 3044-3056

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c02678

关键词

molten salt; pair distribution function; phase diagram; melting; prepeak; chromium chloride; sodium chloride

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DENE0008751]
  2. DOE Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The resurgence of molten salt nuclear reactors creates interesting problems in molten salt chemistry, where the composition and properties of salts change due to fission and corrosion. A study on atomic structure of molten NaCl-CrCl3 found networks of CrCl63- octahedra and an intermediate-range order with a non-monotonic temperature behavior, in agreement with ab initio simulations. The corrosion results in minute quantities of dissolved Cr, leading to potential changes in molten-salt properties.
The resurgence of the molten-salt nuclear reactors (MSRs) creates interesting problems in molten-salt chemistry. As MSRs operate, the composition and physical properties of salts change because of fission and corrosion. Since Cr is the principal corrosion product and NaCl is a common constituent, we studied the atomic structure of molten NaCI-CrCl3. We found networks of CrCl63- octahedra and an intermediate-range order with a non-monotonic temperature behavior with a remarkable agreement between measurements and ab initio simulations. Even though the corrosion results in minute quantities of dissolved Cr, the speciation of Cr could lead to changes in molten-salt properties in nuclear and solar salts. In particular, we found a much lower melting temperature than expected and a broad metastable liquid-solid coexistence phase. The availability of Cr isotopes with very different neutron scattering properties makes Cr an ideal model multivalent ion for experimental validation of new atomistic models such as neural network interatomic potentials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据