4.6 Article

FT-4202, an oral PKR activator, has potent antisickling effects and improves RBC survival and Hb levels in SCA mice

期刊

BLOOD ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 2385-2390

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003604

关键词

-

资金

  1. Forma Therapeutics, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated the effectiveness of FT-4202 in Berkeley SCA mice, showing a reduction in HbS P-50 levels, decreased sickling, improved RBC deformability, increased RBC survival, and elevated Hb levels.
Sickle cell anemia (SCA) results from an abnormal sickle hemoglobin (HbS). HbS polymerizes upon deoxygenation, resulting in red blood cell (RBC) sickling and membrane damage that cause vaso-occlusions and hemolysis. Sickle RBCs contain less adenosine triphosphate and more 2,3-diphosphoglycerate than normal RBCs, which allosterically reduces hemoglobin (Hb) oxygen (O-2) affinity (ie, increases the partial pressure of oxygen at which hemoglobin is 50% saturated with oxygen [P-50]), potentiating HbS polymerization. Herein, we tested the effect of investigational agent FT-4202, an RBC pyruvate kinase (PKR) activator, on RBC sickling and membrane damage by administering it to Berkeley SCA mice. Two-week oral FT-4202 administration was well tolerated, decreasing HbS P-50 to levels similar to HbA and demonstrating beneficial biological effects. In FT-4202-treated animals, there was reduced sickling in vivo, demonstrated by fewer irreversibly sickled cells, and improved RBC deformability, assessed at varying shear stress. Controlled deoxygenation followed by reoxygenation of RBCs obtained from the blood of FT-4202-treated mice showed a shift in the point of sickling to a lower partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)). This led to a nearly 30% increase in RBC survival and a 1.7g/dL increase in Hb level in the FT-4202-treated SCA mice. Overall, our results in SCA mice suggest that FT-4202 might be a potentially useful oral antisickling agent that warrants investigation in patients with SCA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据