4.7 Article

Quorum quenching, biological characteristics, and microbial community dynamics as key factors for combating fouling of membrane bioreactors

期刊

NPJ CLEAN WATER
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41545-021-00110-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) [2020K1A4A7A02108858]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020K1A4A7A02108858] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane fouling is a major challenge in MBRs for wastewater treatment, and this study found that disturbance and solid retention time (SRT) significantly affect the antifouling efficacy of quorum-quenching (QQ) MBRs. The study demonstrates that a long SRT with QQ can effectively reduce membrane fouling, emphasizing the importance of microbial community diversity in MBR behavior.
Membrane fouling is a major challenge in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for wastewater treatment. This study investigates the effects of disturbance and solid retention time (SRT) on quorum-quenching (QQ) MBRs relative to antifouling efficacy and microbial community change. The fouling rate increases with the applied disturbance at a short SRT, counteracting the antifouling effect of QQ; however, it decreases with QQ at a long SRT. The microbial community appears to be responsible for such MBR behaviors. Several bacterial species belonging to the biofilm-forming group are dominant after disturbance, resulting in substantive membrane fouling. However, the balance between the bacterial species plays a key role in MBR fouling propensity when stabilized. Koflera flava becomes dominant with QQ, leading to reduced membrane fouling. QQ makes the MBR microbial community more diverse, while lowering its richness. QQ with long SRT would be a favorable operational strategy for effective MBR fouling control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据