4.7 Article

Task Scheduling for Multi-Cloud Computing Subject to Security and Reliability Constraints

期刊

IEEE-CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 848-865

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JAS.2021.1003934

关键词

Multi-cloud environment; multi-quality of service (QoS); reliability; security; task scheduling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673123, 61603100]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2020A151501482]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work proposes a novel scheduling method called matching and multi-round allocation (MMA) to optimize task completion time and total cost in a multi-cloud environment, ensuring security and reliability constraints are met.
The rise of multi-cloud systems has been spurred. For safety-critical missions, it is important to guarantee their security and reliability. To address trust constraints in a heterogeneous multi-cloud environment, this work proposes a novel scheduling method called matching and multi-round allocation (MMA) to optimize the makespan and total cost for all submitted tasks subject to security and reliability constraints. The method is divided into two phases for task scheduling. The first phase is to find the best matching candidate resources for the tasks to meet their preferential demands including performance, security, and reliability in a multi-cloud environment; the second one iteratively performs multiple rounds of re-allocating to optimize tasks execution time and cost by minimizing the variance of the estimated completion time. The proposed algorithm, the modified cuckoo search (MCS), hybrid chaotic particle search (HCPS), modified artificial bee colony (MABC), max-min, and min-min algorithms are implemented in CloudSim to create simulations. The simulations and experimental results show that our proposed method achieves shorter makespan, lower cost, higher resource utilization, and better trade-off between time and economic cost. It is more stable and efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据