4.7 Review

Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Anterior Ischemic Stroke with Tandem Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 247-254

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4338-y

关键词

Stent retriever; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Large vessel occlusion; Anterior circulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the efficacy and safety profile of stent-retriever thrombectomy (SRT) in acute anterior ischemic stroke patients with tandem occlusion. Using the MEDLINE database, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies that included patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to tandem occlusion who received treatment with SRT between November 2010 and May 2015. The literature search identified 11 previous studies involving a total of 237 subjects out of whom 193 (81.4 %) were treated with acute stent placement for the extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion. Mean initial NIHSS score was 17, and median time from onset to recanalization was 283.5 min. Mean intravenous thrombolysis rate was 63.8 %. In the meta-analysis, the recanalization rate reached 81 % (95 % CI, 73-89). Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes showed a pooled estimate of 44 % (95 % CI, 33-55; 10 studies) for favourable outcome, 13 % (95 % CI, 8-20; 10 studies) for mortality, and 7 % (95 % CI, 2-13; eight studies) for symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. SRT with emergency carotid stenting is associated with acceptable safety and efficacy in acute anterior stroke patients with tandem occlusion compared to natural history. However, the best modality to treat proximal stenosis is based on an individual case basis. aEuro cent Stent retriever thrombectomy of tandem occlusion is efficient and safe. aEuro cent Emergent carotid stenting during thrombectomy increase symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage without impact mortality. aEuro cent Thrombectomy of tandem anterior circulation occlusion may be the first therapeutic option.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据