4.7 Review

Polymer-based thermoelectric materials: A review of power factor improving strategies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIOMICS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 204-220

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.03.013

关键词

Thermoelectric materials; Conductive polymers; poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) derivatives; Carbon nanotubes; Power factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes recent breakthroughs and optimization strategies of polymer-based thermoelectric (TE) materials. Among various organic TE materials, those with remarkable performance are categorized into three groups: poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) derivatives, carbon nanotube/conductive polymer composites, and inorganic semiconductive nanomaterial/polymer composites. The effect of components and structures on power factor is discussed, and suggestions for preparing high-performance polymer-based materials are provided.
Thermoelectric (TE) materials are receiving increasing attention due to their ability to directly converting heat to electricity. They are used to harvest electrical energy from the wasted heat in order to increase the efficiency of global energy. Polymer-based TE materials are particularly fascinating to wearable and mobile devices due to their low density, good flexibility, and low toxicity. This review summarizes the recent breakthroughs and optimization strategies of polymer-based TE materials. Among a large number of different organic TE materials, those with remarkable TE performance are selected and divided into three categories, which are poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) derivatives, carbon nanotube/conductive polymer composites, and inorganic semiconductive nanomaterial/polymer composites. The effect of components and structures on the power factor are presented and discussed. Finally, some challenges are described and suggestions are provided for preparing the next-generation of polymer-based materials with high TE performance. (C) 2021 The Chinese Ceramic Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据