Institutional navigation for polycentric sustainability governance

Sustainability in the Anthropocene requires social cooperation and learning against a backdrop of increasingly complex, polycentric governance. Here, we introduce an institutional navigation framework emphasizing how individuals pursue their policy goals within polycentric sustainability governance. We illustrate the utility of the framework by exploring how actors navigate institutional complexity to increase collective welfare and adaptive capacity in California's San Francisco Bay, in contrast with protecting self-interest and constraining adaptive capacity on Queensland's Great Barrier Reef. Our analysis provides: (1) a normative perspective on how institutional navigation may or may not support sustainability; (2) initial theoretical hypotheses about understudied strategies used by policy actors to advance or constrain sustainability; and (3) some practical ideas for policy actors seeking to strategically achieve complex sustainability goals in polycentric systems. To more effectively navigate environmental politics and governance, this Perspective recommends actions in four areas: knowledge, relationships, strategies, and decision and implementation.

Automated summary

This article introduces an institutional navigation framework that emphasizes how individuals pursue policy goals within polycentric sustainability governance. By contrasting California's San Francisco Bay with Queensland's Great Barrier Reef, the analysis provides a normative perspective, theoretical hypotheses, and practical ideas for policy actors seeking to achieve complex sustainability goals in polycentric systems. The Perspective recommends actions in knowledge, relationships, strategies, and decision and implementation to effectively navigate environmental politics and governance.