4.7 Article

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation of unifocal T1N0M0 papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Preliminary results

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 2934-2940

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4610-1

关键词

Laser; Thermal ablation; Minimally invasive treatment; Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; Ultrasound

资金

  1. national clinical key specialty construction projects of China
  2. Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Shanghai

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous laser ablation (PLA) for unifocal T1N0M0 papillary thyroid microcarcinoma(PTMC). A retrospective study was conducted in 30 patients with single PTMC which was diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). PLA was performed for proper time to achieve adequate ablation zones. The extent of ablation was assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) immediately and 7 days after PLA. Complications were recorded. The size and volume of the ablation area and thyroid hormones were measured, and clinical evaluations were performed at 1, 3, 6 and12 months, and every half year thereafter. The procedure was well tolerated without serious complications. Of the 30 patients, 29 were treated successfully under local anaesthesia in a single session. Only one incomplete ablation was detected by immediate CEUS after PLA, and a second ablation was performed. At the last follow-up, ten (33.3 %) ablation zones had disappeared, and 20 (66.67 %) ablation zones remained as scar-like lesions. No regrowth of treated tumours, local recurrence or distant metastases were detected. During the short-term follow-up period, ultrasound-guided PLA appears to be effective and safe for treating solitary T1N0M0 PTMC in selected patients who are ineligible for surgery. aEuro cent Ultrasound is a useful tool in percutaneous laser ablation (PLA). aEuro cent PLA is safe for treating papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. aEuro cent PLA is effective for single papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据