4.8 Article

Balancing the efficiency, stability, and cost potential for organic solar cells via a new figure of merit

期刊

JOULE
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 1209-1230

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773157, 52061135206]
  2. Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices (South China University of Technology)
  3. Key Laboratory ofMaterials Processing andMold and Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences [BNLMS201905]
  4. DFG [SFB 953]
  5. Bavarian Ministry for Economy
  6. European Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found that as the thickness of the active layer of organic solar cells decreases, the thermal stability gradually increases, leading to the development of a new industrial index, i-FOM2.0, which helps address the balance between efficiency, stability, and cost, and accelerates the commercialization of OSCs.
In spite of the great success in device efficiency resulting from the excessive design of photovoltaic materials, the stability and cost issues concerning basic commercial requirements of organic solar cells (OSCs) remain unresolved or controversial, slowing down the introduction of market-ready applications. We proposed an exciting discovery that as the active layer thickness decreases, the thermal stability increases gradually, even exceeding 100% of the initial efficiency under 150 degrees C thermal stress. This trend was further confirmed by investigating thermodynamics and kinetics of morphology evolution for PM6:Y6 as a reference example, Extended research found that there is a similar correlation between photo-thermal stability and blend thickness. Consequently, a new reliable industrial figure of merit (i-FOM2.0), including four main factors: efficiency, photo-thermal stability, synthesis complexity, and active layer thickness, is presented here. Our work provides a promising trade-off strategy for reducing efficiency-stability-cost gap and accelerates the commercialization of OSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据