4.8 Review

3D/2D passivation as a secret to success for polycrystalline thin-film solar cells

期刊

JOULE
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 1057-1073

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Department of Energy [DE-AC36-08-GO28308]
  2. United States Office of Naval Research [IAG-16-02002]
  3. United States Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office [34346, 34352, 34353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycrystalline photovoltaic materials offer low costs and good scalability, but grain boundaries in these materials may affect carrier recombination. Recent studies have shown that passivation of absorber surfaces through the formation of low-dimensional van der Waals materials can improve device performance in polycrystalline thin-film photovoltaics.
Polycrystalline photovoltaic materials offer low costs and good scalability; however, grain boundaries in these materials are extended defects, which can drastically increase carrier recombination. Interestingly, three leading polycrystalline thin-film technologies. -cadmium telluride (CdTe), Culn(1-x)Ga(x)Se(2) (CIGS), and perovskite solar cells (PSCs)-passivate absorber surfaces in the same way: via formation of low-dimensional, typically two-dimensional (2D), van der Waals materials. This has primarily occurred serendipitously through process optimization, but in some cases, 2D capping layers are intentionally incorporated to improve device performance. Here, evidence compiled from the literature, supplemented with new data where necessary, is presented to illustrate the existence of 3D/2D interfaces in CdTe, CIGS, and PSCs, and their correlation with improved passivation and device performance. This suggests that 3D/2D passivation might be a heretofore unappreciated key to successful polycrystalline thin-film photovoltaics. Finally, the desired attributes of successful low-dimensional layers are presented with rational design strategies for next-generation polycrystalline solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据