4.4 Article

Simulating Miocene Warmth: Insights From an Opportunistic Multi-Model Ensemble (MioMIP1)

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020PA004054

关键词

Miocene; Miocene surface temperature synthesis; model intercomparison; paleoclimate; polar amplification

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AGS-1844380, OCN-2002448]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Council [2016-03912]
  4. Netherlands Earth System Science Center (NESSC) - Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) [024.002.001]
  5. FORMAS [2018-01621]
  6. NERC [NE I006281/1, NE/P019102/1, NE/K014757/1, NE/T007397/1]
  7. NERC PhD studentship
  8. NSF P2C2 program [1602905]
  9. Royal Society
  10. Formas [2018-01621] Funding Source: Formas
  11. NERC [noc010010, NE/K014757/1, NE/P019102/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Swedish Research Council [2016-03912] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  13. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  14. Directorate For Geosciences [1602905] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Miocene epoch was a period of dynamic and warm climate, with reconstructed surface temperatures indicating warmth in midlatitude and polar regions. CO2 concentration was the primary factor controlling global warming, with other factors like paleogeography and ice sheets contributing to raising global temperatures. While progress has been made in simulating Miocene warmth, challenges still remain, emphasizing the need for community-led efforts in coordinating modeling and data activities.
The Miocene epoch, spanning 23.03-5.33 Ma, was a dynamic climate of sustained, polar amplified warmth. Miocene atmospheric CO2 concentrations are typically reconstructed between 300 and 600 ppm and were potentially higher during the Miocene Climatic Optimum (16.75-14.5 Ma). With surface temperature reconstructions pointing to substantial midlatitude and polar warmth, it is unclear what processes maintained the much weaker-than-modern equator-to-pole temperature difference. Here, we synthesize several Miocene climate modeling efforts together with available terrestrial and ocean surface temperature reconstructions. We evaluate the range of model-data agreement, highlight robust mechanisms operating across Miocene modeling efforts and regions where differences across experiments result in a large spread in warming responses. Prescribed CO2 is the primary factor controlling global warming across the ensemble. On average, elements other than CO2, such as Miocene paleogeography and ice sheets, raise global mean temperature by similar to 2 degrees C, with the spread in warming under a given CO2 concentration (due to a combination of the spread in imposed boundary conditions and climate feedback strengths) equivalent to similar to 1.2 times a CO2 doubling. This study uses an ensemble of opportunity: models, boundary conditions, and reference data sets represent the state-of-art for the Miocene, but are inhomogeneous and not ideal for a formal intermodel comparison effort. Acknowledging this caveat, this study is nevertheless the first Miocene multi-model, multi-proxy comparison attempted so far. This study serves to take stock of the current progress toward simulating Miocene warmth while isolating remaining challenges that may be well served by community-led efforts to coordinate modeling and data activities within a common analytical framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据