4.6 Article

Altered cortico-striatal functional connectivity in people with high levels of schizotypy: A longitudinal resting-state study

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102621

关键词

Schizotypy; Cortico-striatal connectivity; Resting-state fMRI

资金

  1. Chinese University of Hong Kong
  2. Research Grants Council [14605717, 14612519]
  3. National Key Research and Development Programme [2016YFC0906402]
  4. CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found impaired cortico-striatal connectivity in individuals with a high level of schizotypy, but improvements over time. The connectivity between the dorsal striatum and the insula may serve as a marker for temporal changes in positive schizotypy.
Purpose of the research: Cortico-striatal functional connectivity has been implicated in the neuropathology of schizophrenia. However, the longitudinal relationship between the cortico-striatal connectivity and schizotypy remains unknown. We examined the resting-state fMRI connectivity in 27 individuals with a high level of schizotypy and 20 individuals with a low level of schizotypy at baseline and 18 months later. Correlations between changes in cortico-striatal connectivity and changes in schizotypy scores over time were examined. Principal results: We found both increased and decreased cortico-striatal connectivity in individuals with a high level of schizotypy at baseline. Over time, these individuals showed improvement in both the negative and positive schizotypal domains. Changes in striatal-insula connectivity were positively correlated with changes in positive schizotypy from baseline to follow-up. Major conclusions: Our results suggested impaired cortico-striatal connectivity in individuals with a high level of schizotypy. The dysconnectivity mainly involves the dorsal striatum. The connectivity between the dorsal striatum and the insula may be a putative marker for temporal changes in positive schizotypy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据