4.7 Article

Novel Genotypes of Nidicolous Argas Ticks and Their Associated Microorganisms From Spain

期刊

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.637837

关键词

soft ticks; Argas spp; nidicolous; cavity-nesting birds; tick-borne bacteria; tick-borne viruses; tick-borne protozoa; Spain

资金

  1. Research Grant Agency (VEGA) of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic
  2. Slovak Academy of Sciences [2/0023/20]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Universities [CGL2014-55969, PGC2018-097426-B-C22]
  4. Spanish State Research Agency [CGL2014-55969, PGC2018-097426-B-C22]
  5. FEDER Program [CGL2014-55969, PGC2018-097426-B-C22]
  6. European Union [CGL2014-55969, PGC2018-097426-B-C22]
  7. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BES-2015-075951]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated soft ticks from bird nests in Spain, identifying new Argas genotypes and associated microorganisms. The reuse of nests by different bird species appears to facilitate the transmission of tick-borne microorganisms. Further research is needed to clarify the taxonomy and role of soft Argas ticks in zoonotic disease epidemiology.
The knowledge of the distribution, richness and epidemiological importance of soft ticks of the genus Argas is incomplete. In Spain, five Argas species have been recorded, including three ornitophilic nidicolous ticks, but their associated microorganisms remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate ticks from bird nests and their microorganisms. Ticks were collected extensively from natural cavities and nest-boxes used by European rollers (Coracias garrulus) and little owls (Athene noctua) in Southeastern and Central Spain. Ticks were morphologically and genetically identified and corresponding DNA/RNA tick extracts were analyzed [individually (n = 150) or pooled (n = 43)] using specific PCR assays for bacteria (Anaplasmataceae, Bartonella, Borrelia, Coxiella/Rickettsiella, and Rickettsia spp.), viruses (Flaviviruses, Orthonairoviruses, and Phenuiviruses), and protozoa (Babesia/Theileria spp.). Six Argas genotypes were identified, of which only those of Argas reflexus (n = 8) were identified to the species level. Two other genotypes were closely related to each other and to Argas vulgaris (n = 83) and Argas polonicus (n = 33), respectively. These two species have not been previously reported from Western Europe. Two additional genotypes (n = 4) clustered with Argas persicus, previously reported in Spain. The remaining genotype (n = 22) showed low sequence identity with any Argas species, being most similar to the African Argas africolumbae. The microbiological screening revealed infection with a rickettsial strain belonging to Rickettsia fournieri and Candidatus Rickettsia vini group in 74.7% of ticks, mainly comprising ticks genetically related to A. vulgaris and A. polonicus. Other tick endosymbionts belonging to Coxiella, Francisella and Rickettsiella species were detected in ten, one and one tick pools, respectively. In addition, one Babesia genotype, closely related to avian Babesia species, was found in one tick pool. Lastly, Anaplasmataceae, Bartonella, Borrelia, and viruses were not detected. In conclusion, five novel Argas genotypes and their associated microorganisms with unproven pathogenicity are reported for Spain. The re-use of nests between and within years by different bird species appears to be ideal for the transmission of tick-borne microorganisms in cavity-nesting birds of semiarid areas. Further work should be performed to clarify the taxonomy and the potential role of soft Argas ticks and their microorganisms in the epidemiology of zoonoses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据