4.5 Article

Clinical Benefits of Oral Anticoagulant Use in Cancer Patients at Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism per Khorana Index

期刊

RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 1855-1867

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S306760

关键词

venous thromboembolism; cancer; oral anticoagulant; Khorana

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2021R1C1C1003735]
  2. Ajou University research fund [S-2020-G0001-00381]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1C1C1003735] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that NOACs had significant effects in preventing VTE complications, especially deep vein thrombosis events, compared to no-use. The effects of NOACs were significant in male and female cancer patients as well as those with a Khorana score =1. Additionally, the risk of adverse bleeding was lower in patients receiving NOACs.
Background: Cancer patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to cancer-induced hypercoagulability. However, current guidelines do not routinely recommend prophylactic use of oral anticoagulants to prevent VTE in cancer patients. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus no anticoagulant use (no-use) and, additionally, differential effects between NOACs and warfarin, in VTE and adverse bleeding prevention among cancer patients, in consideration of risk stratification by gender, high-risk chemotherapy exposure, and Khorana index. Methods: This national health insurance data-based study with a 180-day follow-up enrolled cancer patients with or without oral anticoagulant use in 2017. The primary outcome was VTE risk in oral anticoagulant users vs non-users. Four propensity score-matched comparison pairs were designed: use vs no-use, NOAC vs no-use, warfarin vs no-use, and NOAC vs warfarin. A logistic regression model was used to investigate between-group differences in VTE and bleeding risk. Results: When compared to no-use, NOACs showed substantial effects in preventing VTE complications (OR=0.40, p<0.001), primarily deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events (OR=0.38, p<0.001), in both male and female cancer patients as well as those with a Khorana score =1. Adverse bleeding risk was comparable or lower in NOAC-receiving female patients (p=0.13) and male patients (p=0.04), respectively. In contrast, no protective effects were found with warfarin compared to no-use in controlling thrombosis and adverse bleeding risk. In a head-to-head comparison of NOACs versus warfarin, DVT risk in those patients exposed to high-risk chemotherapy was significantly decreased with NOAC use (OR=0.19, p=0.03). Conclusion: NOACs can be a promising thromboprophylactic option in both male and female cancer patients with VTE risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据