4.4 Article

Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients with acute cholecystitis: efficacy, safety and feasibility. Multicenter randomized control study

期刊

UPDATES IN SURGERY
卷 73, 期 4, 页码 1407-1417

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01031-5

关键词

Enhanced recovery after surgery; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Acute cholecystitis; Intraperitoneal anesthesia; Low-pressure laparoscopy; Length of stay

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a modified ERAS protocol (mERAS) for patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce postoperative length of stay and postoperative pain without increasing complications.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgical procedure in acute cholecystitis (AC). Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs in-hospital stay. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve outcomes of emergency LC. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LC in patients with AC. A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized non-blinded clinical trial (NCT03754751). The mERAS group consisted of 88 patients the control group of 101 patients. The modified protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; PONV prophylaxis, early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS). The postoperative length of stay in the mERAS group was shorter (24 (21-45.5) h) than in the control (45 (41-68) h) (p < 0.0001). One re-admission in the mERAS group was reported (p = 0.466). There difference in complications was insignificant (mERAS 6.8% vs 5% p = 0.757). Post-operative pain intensity was significantly lower in the mERAS group immediately after awaking (3.7 +/- 1.8 vs 5.4 +/- 1.3 p < 0.0001), 2 h (3.3 +/- 1.7 vs 4.9 +/- 1.6 p = 0.0006), 6 h (2.9 +/- 1.5 vs 4.2 +/- 1.2 p < 0.0001), 12 h (2.7 +/- 0.9 vs 4.1 +/- 1.2 p = 0.0001) and 24 h after surgery (2.1 +/- 1.2 vs 3 +/- 1.2 p < 0.0001). The incidence of shoulder and neck pain was lower in mERAS group (13.6% vs 34.7% p = 0.0009). Peristalsis recovery was similar in both groups. The proposed protocol improved postoperative recovery and reduced hospital stay in patients with AC without increasing the rate of complications or re-admissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据