4.6 Review

LAMP in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Focus on Parasites

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030521

关键词

LAMP; neglected tropical diseases; parasites; point-of-care diagnostic

资金

  1. Institute of Health Carlos III, ISCIII, Spain [RICET RD16/0027/0018, PI19/01727]
  2. European Union - FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional) 'Una manera de hacer Europa'
  3. Predoctoral Fellowship Program of University of Salamanca
  4. Santander Bank

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs), particularly those caused by parasites, continue to be a major public health issue in tropical and subtropical regions, affecting 10% of the global population. Isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques, especially loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), have emerged as an affordable alternative to PCR for molecular diagnostics in parasite-caused NTDs.
Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs), particularly those caused by parasites, remain a major Public Health problem in tropical and subtropical regions, with 10% of the world population being infected. Their management and control have been traditionally hampered, among other factors, by the difficulty to deploy rapid, specific, and affordable diagnostic tools in low resource settings. This is especially true for complex PCR-based methods. Isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques, particularly loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), appeared in the early 21st century as an alternative to PCR, allowing for a much more affordable molecular diagnostic. Here, we present the status of LAMP assays development in parasite-caused NTDs. We address the progress made in different research applications of the technique: xenomonitoring, epidemiological studies, work in animal models and clinical application both for diagnosis and evaluation of treatment success. Finally, we try to shed a light on the improvements needed to achieve a true point-of-care test and the future perspectives in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据