4.6 Article

Machine-Learning-Based Rehabilitation Prognosis Prediction in Patients with Ischemic Stroke Using Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040673

关键词

ischemic stroke; brainstem auditory evoked potential; artificial neural network; support vector machine; prognosis

资金

  1. Chungnam National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the feasibility of using BAEP for rehabilitation prognosis prediction in patients with ischemic stroke. The results suggest that combining BAEP interpeak latencies with the basal K-MBI score and age can assist in predicting patient rehabilitation prognoses.
To evaluate the feasibility of brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) for rehabilitation prognosis prediction in patients with ischemic stroke, 181 patients were tested using the Korean version of the modified Barthel index (K-MBI) at admission (basal K-MBI) and discharge (follow-up K-MBI). The BAEP measurements were performed within two weeks of admission on average. The criterion between favorable and unfavorable outcomes was defined as a K-MBI score of 75 at discharge, which was the boundary between moderate and mild dependence in daily living activities. The changes in the K-MBI scores (discharge-admission) were analyzed by nonlinear regression models, including the artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM), with the basal K-MBI score, age, and interpeak latencies (IPLs) of the BAEP (waves I, I-III, and III-V). When including the BAEP features, the correlations of the ANN and SVM regression models increased to 0.70 and 0.64, respectively. In the outcome prediction, the ANN model with the basal K-MBI score, age, and BAEP IPLs exhibited a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 90%. Our results suggest that the BAEP IPLs used with the basal K-MBI score and age can play an adjunctive role in the prediction of patient rehabilitation prognoses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据