4.6 Article

A Novel Mechanical-Based Injective Hydrogel for Treatment with Aromatase Inhibitors Caused Joint Inflammation via the NF-κB Pathway

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 15, 页码 10242-10249

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00580

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201612078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that moderate-strength mechanical hydrogel stimulation may reduce AI-induced FLS inflammation via the NK-.B pathway. Different mechanical strength hydrogels were used to regulate synovium inflammation and reduce inflammatory factors and metalloproteinase expression in synovial tissues and intra-articular synovia.
Synovium has widely participated in induced inflammation, suggesting that it is a potential target to reduce aromatase inhibitors (AIs) causing joint inflammation or pain. Exercise and mechanical stimulation are important strategies for precaution and treatment of bone inflammation. In this work, we developed a novel thermo-sensitive hydrogel, which could be injected intra-articularly. The aim of this research was to investigate the role of various mechanical strength hydrogels in reducing synovium inflammation. The effect of different mechanical strength hydrogels on regulating synovium inflammation was used to stimulate human fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) under a cyclic mechanical compression environment in vitro. Cytokine and metalloprotease expression in FLS was analyzed by the western blot and q-PCR method, in which FLS were cultured with the different mechanical strength hydrogels. The results showed that a moderate-intensity hydrogel mechanical stimulation might be suitable in reducing AI-induced FLS inflammation via the NK-.B pathway. In addition, we built an AI-treated rat model and injected the different mechanical strength hydrogels. Similarly, the moderate-strength mechanical hydrogel could reduce the inflammatory factor and metalloproteinase expression in synovial tissues and intra-articular synovia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据