4.6 Article

A Surface Charge Approach to Investigating the Influence of Oil Contacting Clay Minerals on Wettability Alteration

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 19, 页码 12841-12852

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01221

关键词

-

资金

  1. College of Petroleum and Geoscience, at King Fahd University of Petroleum Minerals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the relationship between reservoir rock wettability and crude oil adsorption, mineral surface charge, and pH change. Results indicate that clay mineral surface charge is influenced by salts, affecting the adsorption of hydrocarbon components.
Reservoir rock wettability has been linked to the adsorption of crude fractions on the rock, with much attention often paid to the bulk mineralogy rather than contacting minerals. Crude oil is contacted by different minerals that contribute to rock wettability. The clay mineral effect on wettability alterations is examined using the mineral surface charge. Also, the pH change effect due to well operations was investigated. Clay mineral surface charge was examined using zeta potential computed from the particle electrophoretic mobility. Clay minerals considered in this study include kaolinite, montmorillonite, illite, and chlorite. Results reveal that the clay mineral charge development is controlled by adsorption of ionic species and double layer collapse. Also, clay mineral surface charge considered in this study shows that their surfaces become more conducive for the adsorption of hydrocarbon components due to the presence of salts. The salt effect is greater in the following order: NaHCO3 < Na2SO4 < NaCl < MgCl2 < CaCl2. Furthermore, different well operations induce pH environments that change the clay mineral surface charge. This change results in adsorption prone surfaces and with reservoir rock made up of different minerals, and the effect of contacting minerals is critical as shown in our findings. This is due to the contacting mineral control wettability rather than the bulk mineralogy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据