4.7 Article

Effect of Different Climate Change Variables on the Ecology and Management of Sesbania cannabina through Glyphosate

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10050910

关键词

elevated [CO2]; ambient [CO2]; moisture stress; S. cannabina; glyphosate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and frequent droughts may give invasive weeds competitive advantages over crops, impacting productivity and herbicide efficacy. A study on Sesbania cannabina growth and management under different climatic scenarios found that 100% field capacity and elevated CO2 concentration of 700 ppm led to better plant growth, while recommended glyphosate application achieved 100% weed biomass reduction but with reduced efficacy at 50% of the recommended rate under certain conditions.
An elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration and frequent droughts are two anticipated climate change scenarios in which certain invasive weeds may develop competitive advantages over crops and adversely impact productivity and herbicide efficacy. Hence, a study was conducted to explore the effect of different climatic scenarios on the growth and management of Sesbania cannabina (Retz.) Pers with glyphosate. The variables investigated were two CO2 concentrations (400 and 700 ppm), two soil moisture levels (100% and 50% of field capacity (FC)), and three glyphosate rates (0 (control), 517 (50% of recommended rate), and 1034 g ae ha(-1) (recommended rate)). CO2 concentrations and soil moisture levels had different effects on the growth and management of S. cannabina. Overall, 100% FC and elevated [CO2] of 700 ppm recorded the maximum plant height (38 cm), leaves per plant (20), growth index (60), chlorophyll content (SPAD value 37), and dry biomass (3 g) in comparison with ambient [CO2] of 400 ppm and 50% FC treatment. The recommended glyphosate application gave 100% weed biomass reduction; however, efficacy was reduced (63%) when applied at 50% of the recommended rate under elevated [CO2] of 700 ppm and 50% FC conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据