4.7 Article

Morphometric and Molecular Diversity among Seven European Isolates of Pratylenchus penetrans

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10040674

关键词

Pratylenchus penetrans; Pratylenchus fallax; root-lesion nematode; genetic diversity; morphometrics; COXI; D2-D3 rDNA; PP5; beta-1,4-endoglucanase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to characterize the morphological and genetic diversity among seven European isolates of Pratylenchus penetrans, revealing discrepancies in morphometric characteristics between different populations and a high level of intraspecific diversity. Phylogenetic analyses did not show a correlation between genetic similarities and geographic origin, and the controversy surrounding the distinction between P. penetrans and P. fallax remains unresolved.
Pratylenchus penetrans is an economically important root-lesion nematode species that affects agronomic and ornamental plants. Understanding its diversity is of paramount importance to develop effective control and management strategies. This study aimed to characterize the morphological and genetic diversity among seven European isolates. An isolate from the USA was included in the molecular analyses for comparative purposes. Morphometrics of the European P. penetrans isolates generally were within the range of the original descriptions for this species. However, multiple morphometric characteristics, including body length, maximum body width, tail length and length of the post-vulval uterine sac showed discrepancies when compared to other populations. Nucleotide sequence-based analyses revealed a high level of intraspecific diversity among the isolates. We observed no correlation between D2-D3 rDNA- and COXI-based phylogenetic similarities and geographic origin. Our phylogenetic analyses including selected GenBank sequences also suggest that the controversy surrounding the distinction between P. penetrans and P. fallax remains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据