4.7 Article

Suppression of an Invasive Native Plant Species by Designed Grassland Communities

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10040775

关键词

design of seed mixtures; grassland establishment; native invasive species; phylogenetic diversity; trait-based restoration

资金

  1. Bavarian State Research Centre for Agriculture, StMELF [A/17/05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study tested designed grassland communities in a greenhouse experiment to determine key drivers of initial Jacobaea aquatica suppression, finding that plant traits had a significant impact on the invader.
Grassland biodiversity is declining due to climatic change, land-use intensification, and establishment of invasive plant species. Excluding or suppressing invasive species is a challenge for grassland management. An example is Jacobaea aquatica, an invasive native plant in wet grasslands of Central Europe, that is causing problems to farmers by being poisonous, overabundant, and fast spreading. This study aimed at testing designed grassland communities in a greenhouse experiment, to determine key drivers of initial J. aquatica suppression, thus dismissing the use of pesticides. We used two base communities (mesic and wet grasslands) with three plant traits (plant height, leaf area, seed mass), that were constrained and diversified based on the invader traits. Native biomass, community-weighted mean trait values, and phylogenetic diversity (PD) were used as explanatory variables to understand variation in invasive biomass. The diversified traits leaf area and seed mass, PD, and native biomass significantly affected the invader. High native biomass permanently suppressed the invader, while functional traits needed time to develop effects; PD effects were significant at the beginning of the experiment but disappeared over time. Due to complexity and temporal effects, community weighted mean traits proved to be moderately successful for increasing invasion resistance of designed grassland communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据