4.7 Article

The effect of environmental justice on social sustainability: a case study of Budi Gandaki Hydropower in Nepal

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101539

关键词

Environmental justice; Social sustainability; Hydropower

资金

  1. China Ministry of Science Technology [DL20200227001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores how negative social consequences of large hydropower projects can be mitigated through careful planning, with a positive relationship found between environmental justice and social sustainability. The research tested a conceptual framework on displaced residents in Nepal, concluding that the mitigation strategies implemented by the Nepalese government for the largest hydropower project were satisfactory.
Large hydropower projects are commonly correlated with negative environmental effects, negative social consequences and inequalities. This study examines the negative social ramification that can be mitigated by careful planning of large hydropower projects, which involves incorporating ideas from theories of environmental justice and evaluating its relationship with social sustainability. A conceptual framework was designed based on the theory of environmental justice, and the findings were interpreted by a statistical hypothesis test from 235 sample questionnaires. The results of this study demonstrate that Environmental Justice and Social Sustainability have a positive relationship. The conceptual framework was tested on the residents being displaced in Nepal by the largest hydropower project. The model tests the social sustainability on the four different aspects of Environmental Justice; Substantive Justice, Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, and Recognition Justice. The research concludes, the mitigation strategies taken by the Nepalese government in the construction of Nepal's biggest hydropower project, `Budi Gandaki Hydropower' to meet the social sustainable aspect of development to be satisfactory. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据