4.7 Review

Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects Are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10051036

关键词

entomophagy; insect edibility; insect farming; insect diversity; acceptability; nutrients; food security; diet

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2018R1A6A1A03024862]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Edible insects are not only a nutritious food, but also a healthy ingredient of traditional dishes. Processing can enhance the nutrient content, taste, flavor, appearance, and palatability of insects, but there are factors that may impact the content and composition of insect species recommended for human consumption.
Edible insects have been considered as either nutritious food itemsper se, or as wholesome ingredients to various dishes and components of traditional subsistence. Protein, fat, mineral and vitamin contents in insects generally satisfy the requirements of healthy food, although there is considerable variation associated with insect species, collection site, processing method, insect life stage, rearing technology and insect feed. A comparison of available data(based on dry weight) showed that processing can improve the nutrient content, taste, flavour, appearance and palatability of insects, but that there are additional factors, which can impact the content and composition of insect species that have been recommended for consumption by humans. This review focuses on factors that have received little attention in connection with the task to improve acceptability or choice of edible insects and suggests ways to guarantee food security in countries where deficiencies in protein and minerals are an acute and perpetual problem. This review is meant to assist the food industry to select the most suitable species as well as processing methods for insect-based food products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据