4.7 Article

Design and Nutrient Analysis of a Carotenoid-Rich Food Product to Address Vitamin A and Protein Deficiency

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10051019

关键词

-

资金

  1. Interdisciplinary Graduate Research and Education in Sustainable Food Systems from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2016-38420-25578]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to create a food product using sweet potatoes, peanut paste, and legumes to meet daily vitamin A requirements and provide complete protein. However, the total beta-carotene content was found to be lower than predicted in the final product.
Worldwide undernutrition affects over 820 million individuals and is the underlying cause of over 50% of all childhood deaths. Sweet potatoes have been promoted to address vitamin A (vitA) deficiency, with a single, orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) providing enough vitA, as beta-carotene, to meet daily needs. However, the bioavailability of beta-carotene is dependent on the presence of dietary fat, which is not provided by OFSP, and it lacks some essential amino acids. Therefore, in an attempt to create a food product that meets daily vitA requirements with adequate bioavailability and complete protein, we designed and assessed a sweet potato, peanut paste, and legume product. The final food product formulation, developed through computer modeling, resulted in a 65/5/35 (w/w/w) formulation in a 250 g serving and similar to 330 kcal. We then confirmed the nutrient content of macronutrients, and essential amino acids, zinc, and iron contents. Total beta-carotene was assessed by HPLC and was lower than predicted through computer modeling, likely due to losses through thermal processing and/or degradation from storage. The results of this project indicate that the three ingredients can be combined into a single 250 g food product to provide >300 kcal energy, complete protein, and micronutrients in a more bioavailable form.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据