4.7 Article

Study of the rejection of contaminants of emerging concern by a biomimetic aquaporin hollow fiber forward osmosis membrane

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101914

关键词

Forward Osmosis (FO); Aquaporin membrane; Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs); Hollow fiber module

资金

  1. Regional Government of Castilla y Leon
  2. EU-FEDER [INFRARED-2018-UVA3, CLU 2017-09, VA088G19, UIC 071, UIC 082]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2019-109403RB-C21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forward osmosis (FO) with biomimetic hollow fiber module demonstrated high rejection rates for 24 Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs), with rejections above 93% and up to 99% observed. While compounds showed close to 100% rejections, they were not fully recovered in the feed solution, necessitating two membrane rinses after each operation for complete recovery. The physicochemical properties of contaminants were considered in the analysis.
Forward osmosis (FO) plays an increasingly important role in membrane processes because of its advantages compared to traditional pressure-driven membrane processes. There are different types of water-selective FO membranes. In this study, a biomimetic hollow fiber module comprising an active layer of polyamide thin film composite (TFC) with integrated aquaporin proteins and an effective area of 0.6 m(2) is used to study the rejection of 24 Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs). The rejections obtained for all the contaminants studied were higher than 93 % and for 19 of them rejections of up to 99 % were reached. It was observed that although all the tested compounds showed rejections very close to 100 %, they were not completely recovered in the feed solution which makes the retention within the membrane an important factor to be considered. Hence, two membrane rinses were necessary after each membrane operation to completely recover each contaminant. The results were analyzed considering the physicochemical properties (molecular weight, charge and hydrophobicity) of the contaminants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据