4.7 Article

Preparation of Fe-SnO2@CeO2 nanocomposite electrode for asymmetric supercapacitor device performance analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102402

关键词

Co-precipitation; Fe-SnO2@CeO2; Nanocomposite; Asymmetric supercapacitor

资金

  1. RUSA 2.0 [Alu/RUSA/Ph.D Fellowships/2019, 24-51/2014]
  2. DST-SERB [EMR/2017/001999]
  3. DST-FIST [SR/FST/PSI-202/2015]
  4. UGC-SAP [F.530/18/DRS-III/2015]
  5. DST-PURSE [SR/PURSE Phase 2/38 (G)]
  6. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2020/06 06]
  7. MHRD [SPARC-890 (2019)]
  8. MHRD (UKIERI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents an Fe-SnO2@CeO2 electrode with enhanced specific capacitance and cycle stability for supercapacitor applications. The Fe-SnO2@CeO2 nanocomposite exhibits excellent electrochemical performance in a three-electrode system, making it a promising alternative electrode material for high energy storage supercapacitors.
In this work, we report enhanced specific capactance and cycle stability of Fe-SnO2@CeO2 electrode for supercapacitor applications. The Fe-SnO2@CeO2 nanocomposite was synthesized through a simple chemical co-precipitation method. The electrochemical performances of the Fe-SnO2@CeO2 nanocomposite electrode are assessed by using cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge/discharge and impedance spectroscopy techniques. In three electrode system, the Fe-SnO2@CeO2 nanocomposite electrode is exhibited a maximum specific capacitance of 348 F/g at a current density of 1 A/g. Further, the asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) device performance has been evaluated and the ASC device produces a specific energy and specific power of 32.2 W h kg(-1) and 747 W kg(-1) at a current density of 1A/g, respectively. The device exhibited the capacitance retention of 85.05 % over 5000 cycles of operation. This study confirms that the Fe-SnO2@CeO2 is an alternative electrode material for high energy storage supercapacitor applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据