4.7 Article

Spectral control of deterministically fabricated quantum dot waveguide systems using the quantum confined Stark effect

期刊

APL PHOTONICS
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0050152

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU via the International Training Network QUDOT-TECH
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) via the Collaborative Research Center [CRC 787]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [Re2974/9-1, Re2974/29-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deterministic integration of self-assembled quantum dots in waveguide structures has been achieved using in situ electron beam lithography. Spectral fine-tuning of the QDs has been achieved by applying external bias voltages, with the potential to enable the scalable fabrication of integrated quantum photonic circuits in the future.
Quantum photonic circuits with integrated on-demand quantum emitters can act as building blocks for photonic gates and processors with enhanced quantum functionality. To scale up such quantum devices to larger and more powerful systems, eventually reaching the quantum advantage, the scalable integration of many emitters with identical emission wavelengths is of utmost importance. Here, we report on the deterministic integration of self-assembled quantum dots (QDs) in waveguide structures by means of in situ electron beam lithography (EBL). Applying external bias voltages to the p-i-n-doped and electrically contacted quantum circuits allows for spectral fine-tuning of the QDs via the quantum confined Stark effect. We achieve a tuning range of (0.40 +/- 0.16) nm, which together with a spectral pre-selection accuracy of (0.2 +/- 1.6) nm in the in situ EBL process is on average large enough to tune individual QDs into resonance. Thus, deterministic QD integration with spectral pre-selection in conjunction with Stark tuning of the QD emission wavelength is an attractive combination that has high potential to enable the scalable fabrication of integrated quantum photonic circuits in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据