4.7 Article

Methylglyoxal-Dependent Glycative Stress Is Prevented by the Natural Antioxidant Oleuropein in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells through Nrf2/Glo1 Pathway

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox10050716

关键词

methylglyoxal; oleuropein; dental pulp stem cells; glyoxalase 1; Nrf2; glycative stress; inflammation; oxidative stress; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that oleuropein (OP), a major bioactive component of olive leaf, can prevent methylglyoxal (MG)-induced glycative stress and damage to human dental pulp stem cells by restoring the activity of the detoxifying enzyme Glyoxalase 1. This suggests that OP shows promise in the development of preventive strategies for MG-derived AGEs-associated oral diseases.
Methylglyoxal (MG) is a potent precursor of glycative stress (abnormal accumulation of advanced glycation end products, AGEs), a relevant condition underpinning the etiology of several diseases, including those of the oral cave. At present, synthetic agents able to trap MG are known; however, they have never been approved for clinical use because of their severe side effects. Hence, the search of bioactive natural scavengers remains a sector of strong research interest. Here, we investigated whether and how oleuropein (OP), the major bioactive component of olive leaf, was able to prevent MG-dependent glycative stress in human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). The cells were exposed to OP at 50 mu M for 24 h prior to the administration of MG at 300 mu M for additional 24 h. We found that OP prevented MG-induced glycative stress and DPSCs impairment by restoring the activity of Glyoxalase 1 (Glo1), the major detoxifying enzyme of MG, in a mechanism involving the redox-sensitive transcription factor Nrf2. Our results suggest that OP holds great promise for the development of preventive strategies for MG-derived AGEs-associated oral diseases and open new paths in research concerning additional studies on the protective potential of this secoiridoid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据