4.7 Article

Expression and Functional Analysis of the Argonaute Protein of Thermus thermophilus (TtAgo) in E. coli BL21(DE3)

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom11040524

关键词

TtAgo; in vivo; endonucleases; mutagenesis; fabI; triclosan

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX08010-09B, 2014ZX08010-09B]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31702099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully expressed Thermus thermophilus pAgo and established a screening system for isolating loss-of-function mutants. By utilizing the property of pAgo inducing loss of its expression plasmid, the mechanisms by which TtAgo functions as a defense against foreign DNA invasion were revealed.
The prokaryotic Argonaute proteins (pAgos) have been reported to cleave or interfere with DNA targets in a guide-dependent or independent manner. It is often difficult to characterize pAgos in vivo due to the extreme environments favored by their hosts. In the present study, we expressed functional Thermus thermophilus pAgo (TtAgo) in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells at 37 degrees C. Initial attempts to express TtAgo in BL21(DE3) cells at 37 degrees C failed. This was not because of TtAgo mediated general toxicity to the host cells, but instead because of TtAgo-induced loss of its expression plasmid. We employed this discovery to establish a screening system for isolating loss-of-function mutants of TtAgo. The E. coli fabI gene was used to help select for full-length TtAgo loss of function mutants, as overexpression of fabI renders the cell to be resistant to the triclosan. We isolated and characterized eight mutations in TtAgo that abrogated function. The ability of TtAgo to induce loss of its expression vector in vivo at 37 degrees C is an unreported function that is mechanistically different from its reported in vitro activity. These results shed light on the mechanisms by which TtAgo functions as a defense against foreign DNA invasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据