4.7 Review

mRNA-Based Vaccines

期刊

VACCINES
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9040390

关键词

mRNA; vaccine constructs; delivery systems; lipid nanoparticles; cancer; infectious disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increases in global population and population density have led to the spread of emerging pathogens, making vaccines the most cost-effective means of prevention. Traditional methods of vaccine production are not sufficient to ensure global protection, highlighting the urgent need for new technologies. mRNA-based vaccines offer numerous advantages over conventional vaccines, including safety, ability to generate both humoral and cell-mediated immunity, well-tolerated by healthy individuals, cost-effectiveness, and rapid production.
Increases in the world's population and population density promote the spread of emerging pathogens. Vaccines are the most cost-effective means of preventing this spread. Traditional methods used to identify and produce new vaccines are not adequate, in most instances, to ensure global protection. New technologies are urgently needed to expedite large scale vaccine development. mRNA-based vaccines promise to meet this need. mRNA-based vaccines exhibit a number of potential advantages relative to conventional vaccines, namely they (1) involve neither infectious elements nor a risk of stable integration into the host cell genome; (2) generate humoral and cell-mediated immunity; (3) are well-tolerated by healthy individuals; and (4) are less expensive and produced more rapidly by processes that are readily standardized and scaled-up, improving responsiveness to large emerging outbreaks. Multiple mRNA vaccine platforms have demonstrated efficacy in preventing infectious diseases and treating several types of cancers in humans as well as animal models. This review describes the factors that contribute to maximizing the production of effective mRNA vaccine transcripts and delivery systems, and the clinical applications are discussed in detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据