4.5 Article

Production of Ulva prolifera derived biochar and evaluation of adsorptive removal of Reactive Red 120: batch, isotherm, kinetic, thermodynamic and regeneration studies

期刊

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 5379-5390

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-021-01483-0

关键词

Desorption; Isotherm; Kinetics; Reactive Red 120; Ulva prolifera-derived biochar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A marine seaweed Ulva prolifera was used to produce biochar for the decolorization of Reactive Red 120 in aqueous solutions. The batch experiments showed that the biochar had a high sorption capacity and could remove 85.7% of dye molecules. The optimal conditions were determined for pH, sorbent dose, and temperature. Additionally, the adsorption isotherms, kinetic models, and desorption efficiency were also investigated.
A marine seaweed Ulva prolifera was used to produce biochar for the decolorization of Reactive Red 120 (RR120) in aqueous solutions in batch mode operation. The batch results concluded that the biochar has the potential of removing 85.7% of dye molecules with a sorption capacity of 107.13 mg/g. The influencing parameters namely pH, sorbent dose, and temperature were studied and optimum results were obtained at a solute pH of 2, sorbent (biochar) dose of 2 g/L, and temperature of 35 degrees C respectively. Based on the partition coefficient, the optimum initial RR120 concentration was achieved, and a maximum partition coefficient of 3 L/g was obtained at an initial RR120 concentration of 250 mg/L. Further adsorption isotherms namely two, three, and four parameter models, kinetic models, and statistical error analysis were also studied. The desorption experiments were also studied for calculating the desorption efficiency using different elutants, solid to liquid (S/L) ratios, and regeneration cycles. For sodium hydroxide, a desorption efficiency of 99.2% with an S/L ratio of 3 and a regeneration cycle of 2 was achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据