4.6 Article

Does haze pollution affect public health in China from the perspective of environmental efficiency?

期刊

ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 16343-16357

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01352-w

关键词

Haze pollution; PM2; 5; Environmental efficiency; Public health

资金

  1. MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Youth Foundation Project of Humanities and Social Sciences [20YJCZH118]
  2. Key Research Projects of Higher Education in Henan Province [19A790003]
  3. Project of Philosophy and Social Science Planning in Henan Province [2019CZH008]
  4. Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673022, 71704010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces haze pollution into the environmental efficiency evaluation framework and measures PM2.5 environmental efficiency in China during 2001-2017. The results show regional diversity in PM2.5 environmental efficiency and a significant positive impact on public health.
This study attempts to introduce haze pollution into the environmental efficiency evaluation framework and measures PM2.5 environmental efficiency in China during 2001-2017 based on the slack-based measure (SBM)-undesirable model. The results show that the PM2.5 environmental efficiency value is 0.707 in China with a trend of slow decline over time, and there is regional diversity in PM2.5 environmental efficiency, with eastern, central and western values of 0.912, 0.554 and 0.601, respectively. Furthermore, this study examines the impact of PM2.5 environmental efficiency (EFF) on public health. The empirical findings indicate that EFF has a significant positive impact on public health. That is, if EFF is increased by 1%, respiratory disease mortality per 10,000 persons will be decreased by 2% provided that all other variables remain unchanged. In addition, medical technical personal in healthcare institutions per 1000 persons (RYS), population density (POP) and urbanization level (CITY) play an active role in promoting the level of public health. However, healthcare expenditure as a percentage of the per capita disposable income of rural households (NC), health expenditure as a percentage of GDP in fiscal expenditure (GJK) and the per capita tobacco expenditure of urban households (YC) all hinder the improvement of public health. Finally, the paper fails to observe a significant relationship between healthcare expenditure as a percentage of per capita disposable income of urban households (CZ), the enrolment rate of school-age children (EDU) and public health. Finally, this paper provides policy recommendations on controlling haze pollution, developing an efficient economy and improving public health in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据