4.7 Article

Climate Projections for Precipitation and Temperature Indicators in the Douro Wine Region: The Importance of Bias Correction

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11050990

关键词

bias correction; climate change; extreme events; grapevine; douro wine region

资金

  1. project INFRAVINI: Spatial data infrastructure for the management of climate change in viniculture operation - European Found for Regional Development (FEDER) through the NORTE 2020 (Regional Operational Program of North 2014/2020) [NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-039739]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlights the significant impacts of climate change on viticulture and winemaking, suggesting the importance of selecting the most accurate bias correction method for climate projections. It emphasizes the necessity of timely adaptation strategies for the regional winemaking sector to enhance climate resilience and ensure future sustainability in the face of projected warming and drying trends.
The implications of weather and climate extremes on the viticulture and winemaking sector can be particularly detrimental and acquire more relevance under a climate change context. A four-member ensemble of the Regional Climate Model-Global Climate Model chain simulations is used to evaluate the potential impacts of climate change on indices of extreme temperature and precipitation, as well as on agroclimatic indices of viticultural suitability in the Douro Wine Region, Portugal, under current and future climate conditions, following the RCP8.5 anthropogenic radiative forcing scenario. Historical (1989-2005) and future (2051-2080) periods are considered for this purpose. Although model outputs are bias-corrected to improve the accuracy of the results, owing to the sensitivity of the climatic indicators to the specific bias correction method, the performance of the linear and quantile mapping methods are compared. The results hint at the importance of choosing the most accurate method (quantile mapping), not only in replicating extremes events but also in reproducing the accumulated agroclimatic indices. Significant differences between the bias correction methods are indeed found for the number of extremely warm days (maximum temperature > 35 degrees C), number of warm spells, number of warm spell days, number of consecutive dry days, the Dryness Index, and growing season precipitation. The Huglin Index reveals lower sensitivity, thus being more robust to the choice of the method. Hence, an unsuitable bias correction method may hinder the accuracy of climate change projections in studies heavily relying on derived extreme indices and agroclimatic indicators, such as in viticulture. Regarding the climate change signal, significant warming and drying trends are projected throughout the target region, which is supported by previous studies, but also accompanied by an increase of intensity, frequency, and duration of extreme events, namely heatwaves and dry spells. These findings thereby corroborate the need to adopt timely and effective adaptation strategies by the regional winemaking sector to warrant its future sustainability and enhance climate resilience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据