4.5 Article

Effect of Zataria multiflora essential oil and potassium sorbate on inoculated Listeria monocytogenes, microbial and chemical quality of raw trout fillet during refrigerator storage

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 3015-3025

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2259

关键词

Listeria monocytogenes; potassium sorbate; rainbow trout fillet; shelf life; Zataria multiflora

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the impact of Zataria multiflora essential oil (ZEO) and potassium sorbate (PS) on microbial and chemical changes in raw rainbow trout. Results showed that treating rainbow trout fillet with 1.5% ZEO is the best method for controlling L. monocytogenes growth at refrigerator temperature without any undesirable sensory effects.
Human listeriosis is predominantly associated with contaminated food consumption, including seafood, shrimp, and RTE foods. Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen that is mainly found in freshwater, seawater, and fish mucus. Seafood contamination can occur during food processing. L.monocytogenes levels of below 100 cfu/g can be found in seafood samples. The present study was conducted to investigates the effect of Zataria multiflora essential oil (ZEO) and potassium sorbate (PS) on microbial and chemical changes in raw rainbow trout at 4 degrees C to extent shelf life and improve food safety. First, the chemical compositions of ZEO were identified. Then, different percentage of ZEO (1.5, 0.8, and 0.5%) and PS (2%) were inoculated in raw fish fillets and analyzed for TVC, TBA, TVB-N, pH, sensory attributes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and inoculated L. monocytogenes (1 x 10(5) cfu/g) survival at 4 degrees C for 12 days. The best sensory evaluation score was observed for the samples treated with 0.8% and 1.5% ZEO. Overall, this study results indicated that the treatment of rainbow trout fillet with 1.5% ZEO is the best method for controlling the growth of L. monocytogenes at refrigerator temperature without any undesirable sensory effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据