4.7 Article

Freedom and Animal Welfare

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani11041148

关键词

freedom; animal welfare; applied ethics; captivity; zoo welfare

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme [851145]
  2. Paul Griffiths' Australian Laureate Fellowship project A Philosophy of Medicine for the 21st Century [FL170100160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ongoing debate on the ethics of keeping animals in captivity questions whether freedom is important for animal welfare. This paper discusses the importance of freedom for animal welfare and calls for more scientific research on comparative welfare data between captive and wild animals. Understanding the links between freedom and animal welfare will lead to more empirically informed ethical decisions regarding captive animals.
Simple Summary There is an ongoing debate on the ethics of keeping animals in captivity and particularly as to whether freedom matters to their welfare. Freedom is a continuum, and zoo animals are provided with some freedoms that wild animals are not (such as freedom from hunger or disease) but may also lack some freedoms (such as behavioural choice). In this paper, we look at how freedom may benefit animal welfare by allowing them access to the resources they need, as well as through the additional value of a free life itself. In the end, we call for more scientific work on comparisons between the welfare of captive and wild animals, as we cannot guess what is good for animals without conducting research to find out. Knowing more about the welfare of captive and wild animals and how it relates to the amount of freedom they experience will allow us to discover what is important for animal welfare and make decisions that better reflect the animals' own point of view. The keeping of captive animals in zoos and aquariums has long been controversial. Many take freedom to be a crucial part of animal welfare and, on these grounds, criticise all forms of animal captivity as harmful to animal welfare, regardless of their provisions. Here, we analyse what it might mean for freedom to matter to welfare, distinguishing between the role of freedom as an intrinsic good, valued for its own sake and an instrumental good, its value arising from the increased ability to provide other important resources. Too often, this debate is conducted through trading intuitions about what matters for animals. We argue for the need for the collection of comparative welfare data about wild and captive animals in order to settle the issue. Discovering more about the links between freedom and animal welfare will then allow for more empirically informed ethical decisions regarding captive animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据