4.6 Review

Drone Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Review

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10090999

关键词

unmanned aerial vehicles; UAVs; guidance; navigation; control; machine learning; deep reinforcement learning (DRL); literature review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly used in various applications, requiring a high level of autonomy for accomplishing planned missions without human intervention. Artificial intelligence algorithms like deep reinforcement learning (DRL) are designed for UAVs' guidance, navigation, and control, but further research efforts are needed to address challenges in deployment in real-life scenarios.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly being used in many challenging and diversified applications. These applications belong to the civilian and the military fields. To name a few; infrastructure inspection, traffic patrolling, remote sensing, mapping, surveillance, rescuing humans and animals, environment monitoring, and Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance (ISTAR) operations. However, the use of UAVs in these applications needs a substantial level of autonomy. In other words, UAVs should have the ability to accomplish planned missions in unexpected situations without requiring human intervention. To ensure this level of autonomy, many artificial intelligence algorithms were designed. These algorithms targeted the guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) of UAVs. In this paper, we described the state of the art of one subset of these algorithms: the deep reinforcement learning (DRL) techniques. We made a detailed description of them, and we deduced the current limitations in this area. We noted that most of these DRL methods were designed to ensure stable and smooth UAV navigation by training computer-simulated environments. We realized that further research efforts are needed to address the challenges that restrain their deployment in real-life scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据