4.6 Article

Flow Field Effect on the Performance of Direct Formic Acid Membraneless Fuel Cells: A Numerical Study

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9050746

关键词

membraneless; flow field; fuel cell; formic acid; simulation

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 108-2628-E-992-001-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of air-breathing and air-feeding direct formic acid membraneless fuel cells with different flow fields was numerically investigated. Results showed that air-breathing DFAMFC with identical liquid flow field yielded the highest cell output, while the preferred design for air-feeding DFAMFC was found to have specific liquid and air flow field combinations for optimal performance under different conditions.
The performance of both air-breathing and air-feeding direct formic acid membraneless fuel cells (DFAMFCs) possessing different flow fields were numerically investigated in this study at given concentration and flow rate for both fuel and electrolyte. Single serpentine, stepwise broadening serpentine, multi-serpentine and parallel channel were tested as liquid flow field, while single serpentine, stepwise broadening serpentine, multi-serpentine and pin channel were tested as air flow field. The channel width was either 0.8 mm or 1.3 mm. The simulation results showed that the air-breathing DFAMFC having identical flow field for both fuel and electrolyte yielded highest cell output. The air-breathing DFAMFC having SBS liquid flow field yielded a maximum power density of 10.5 mW/cm(2), while the air-breathing DFAMFC having S(1.3) liquid flow field produced an open circuit voltage of 1.0 V owing to few formic acid penetration into the cathode. Concerning the air-feeding DFAMFCs, the DFAMFC having SBS liquid flow field and MS(0.8) air flow field yielded highest peak power density, 12 mW/cm(2), at an airflow rate of 500 sccm. Considering the power generated by the DFAMFCs together with the power consumed by the air pump, DFAMFC having SBS liquid flow field and Pin(0.8) air flow field could be the preferred design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据