4.6 Article

Enhancement of Thermophilic Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent by pH Adjustment and Effluent Recycling

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9050878

关键词

biogas production; biogas effluent recycling; low pH inhibition; oil palm ash; palm oil mill effluent; thermophilic condition

资金

  1. Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (RGJ-Ph.D. Program) [PHD57/0042]
  2. Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO) [044/2560]
  3. Thailand Research Fund [RTA6280001]
  4. Mid-Career Research Grant [RSA6180048]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that adjusting the pH of POME with oil palm ash significantly increased methane production, while biogas effluent recycling helped prevent pH drops, showing promising regulation effects.
A sudden pH drops always inhibits the anaerobic digestion (AD) reactor for biogas production from palm oil mill effluent (POME). The pH adjustment of POME by oil palm ash addition and the biogas effluent recycling effect on the preventing of pH drop and change of the archaea community was investigated. The pH adjustment of POME to 7.5 increased the methane yield two times more than raw POME (pH 4.3). The optimal dose for pH adjustment by oil palm ash addition was 5% w/v with a methane yield of 440 mL-CH4/gVS. The optimal dose for pH adjustment by biogas effluent recycling was 20% v/v with a methane yield of 351 mL-CH4/gVS. Methane production from POME in a continuous reactor with pH adjustment by 5% w/v oil palm ash and 20% v/v biogas effluent recycling was 19.1 +/- 0.25 and 13.8 +/- 0.3 m(3) CH4/m(3)-POME, respectively. The pH adjustment by oil palm ash enhanced methane production for the long-term operation with the stability of pH, alkalinity, and archaea community. Oil palm ash increased the number of Methanosarcina mazei and Methanothermobacter defluvii. Oil palm ash is a cost-effective alkali material as a source of buffer and trace metals for preventing the pH drop and the increased methanogen population in the AD process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据