4.6 Article

Personalized cancer vaccine strategy elicits polyfunctional T cells and demonstrates clinical benefits in ovarian cancer

期刊

NPJ VACCINES
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41541-021-00297-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01-CA83638]
  2. Immunotherapy Initiative for Ovarian Cancer (ITI-OC)
  3. Markus Foundation
  4. Rivkin Center for Ovarian Cancer
  5. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  6. Research Foundation for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By adding ASA and low-dose IL-2 to the OCDC-Bev-Cy combination regimen, we elicited vaccine-specific T-cell responses that positively correlated with prolonged time-to-progression and overall survival in patients. This combinatorial strategy was effective and demonstrated the utility of the ID8 ovarian model for future ovarian trial development.
T cells are important for controlling ovarian cancer (OC). We previously demonstrated that combinatorial use of a personalized whole-tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine (OCDC), bevacizumab (Bev), and cyclophosphamide (Cy) elicited neoantigen-specific T cells and prolonged OC survival. Here, we hypothesize that adding acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and low-dose interleukin (IL)-2 would increase the vaccine efficacy in a recurrent advanced OC phase I trial (NCT01132014). By adding ASA and low-dose IL-2 to the OCDC-Bev-Cy combinatorial regimen, we elicited vaccine-specific T-cell responses that positively correlated with patients' prolonged time-to-progression and overall survival. In the ID8 ovarian model, animals receiving the same regimen showed prolonged survival, increased tumor-infiltrating perforin-producing T cells, increased neoantigen-specific CD8(+) T cells, and reduced endothelial Fas ligand expression and tumor-infiltrating T-regulatory cells. This combinatorial strategy was efficacious and also highlighted the predictive value of the ID8 model for future ovarian trial development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据