4.4 Article

Control and Elimination of Schistosomiasis as a Public Health Problem: Thresholds Fail to Differentiate Schistosomiasis Morbidity Prevalence in Children

期刊

OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab179

关键词

control; elimination; mass drug administration; morbidity; preventive chemotherapy; schistosomiasis; ultrasound

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [13122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current classification of heavy-intensity infections does not effectively differentiate the prevalence of morbidity markers for schistosomiasis, suggesting a reevaluation of control criteria is necessary.
Background. Current World Health Organization guidelines utilize prevalence of heavy-intensity infections (PHIs), that is, >= 50 eggs per 10 mL of urine for Schistosoma haematobium and >= 400 eggs per gram of stool for S. mansoni, to determine whether a targeted area has controlled schistosomiasis morbidity or eliminated schistosomiasis as a public health problem. The relationship between these PHI categories and morbidity is not well understood. Methods. School-age participants enrolled in schistosomiasis monitoring and evaluation cohorts from 2003 to 2008 in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia were surveyed for infection and morbidity at baseline and after 1 and 2 rounds of preventive chemotherapy. Logistic regression was used to compare morbidity prevalence among participants based on their school's PHI category. Results. Microhematuria levels were associated with the S. haematobium PHI categories at all 3 time points. For any other S. haematobium or S. mansoni morbidity that was measured, PHI categories did not differentiate morbidity prevalence levels consistently. Conclusions. These analyses suggest that current PHI categorizations do not differentiate the prevalence of standard morbidity markers. A reevaluation of the criteria for schistosomiasis control is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据