4.5 Review

Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure in Diabetes

期刊

DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 146-+

出版社

KOREAN DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2020.0282

关键词

Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic cardiomyopathies; Diagnosis; Epidemiology; Heart failure; Treatment

资金

  1. SNUBH Research Fund [14-2015-029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes increases the risk of cardiovascular disease by affecting vascular homeostasis and myocardial function. Prognosis is worse in heart failure patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes.
The cardiovascular disease continuum begins with risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (DM), progresses to vasculopathy and myocardial dysfunction, and finally ends with cardiovascular death. Diabetes is associated with a 2- to 4-fold increased risk for heart failure (HF). Moreover, HF patients with DM have a worse prognosis than those without DM. Diabetes can cause myocardial ischemia via micro- and macrovasculopathy and can directly exert deleterious effects on the myocardium. Hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and insulin resistance can cause alterations in vascular homeostasis. Then, reduced nitric oxide and increased reactive oxygen species levels favor inflammation leading to atherothrombotic progression and myocardial dysfunction. The classification, diagnosis, and treatment of HF for a patient with and without DM remain the same. Until now, drugs targeting neurohumoral and metabolic pathways improved mortality and morbidity in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Therefore, all HFrEF patients should receive guideline-directed medical therapy. By contrast, drugs modulating neurohumoral activity did not improve survival in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. Trials investigating whether sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are effective in HFpEF are on-going. This review will summarize the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of HF in diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据