4.6 Review

The Role of Liquid Biopsy in Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.634316

关键词

lung cancer; clinical biomarkers detection; liquid biopsy; cell-free DNA; exosomes; tumor-educated platelets; circulating tumor associated cells

类别

资金

  1. ERDF-European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalization-COMPETE 2020 Programme
  2. Portuguese funding agency, FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid biopsy is an emerging technology that shows potential in the screening and early detection of lung cancer. Various liquid biopsy-derived biomarkers have been identified, but their diagnostic performance and clinical applicability are still limited. Combining different biomarkers and using them in conjunction with other diagnostic tools hold promise, but further research is needed to define and validate the role of liquid biopsies in clinical practice.
Liquid biopsy is an emerging technology with a potential role in the screening and early detection of lung cancer. Several liquid biopsy-derived biomarkers have been identified and are currently under ongoing investigation. In this article, we review the available data on the use of circulating biomarkers for the early detection of lung cancer, focusing on the circulating tumor cells, circulating cell-free DNA, circulating micro-RNAs, tumor-derived exosomes, and tumor-educated platelets, providing an overview of future potential applicability in the clinical practice. While several biomarkers have shown exciting results, diagnostic performance and clinical applicability is still limited. The combination of different biomarkers, as well as their combination with other diagnostic tools show great promise, although further research is still required to define and validate the role of liquid biopsies in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据