4.6 Review

Inflammation Regulates the Multi-Step Process of Retinal Regeneration in Zebrafish

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10040783

关键词

Mü ller glia; microglia; photoreceptor; cytokine; damage; reprogramming; proliferation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EY07060, P30EY07003]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness, New York

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zebrafish have remarkable regenerative potential, with the ability to regenerate almost all tissues and organs. In the zebrafish brain and retina, radial glia can reprogram into stem-like cells to repair damaged tissues. Inflammation plays a crucial role in regulating the process of retinal regeneration, affecting the quiescence, division, and survival of the cells involved.
The ability to regenerate tissues varies between species and between tissues within a species. Mammals have a limited ability to regenerate tissues, whereas zebrafish possess the ability to regenerate almost all tissues and organs, including fin, heart, kidney, brain, and retina. In the zebrafish brain, injury and cell death activate complex signaling networks that stimulate radial glia to reprogram into neural stem-like cells that repair the injury. In the retina, a popular model for investigating neuronal regeneration, Muller glia, radial glia unique to the retina, reprogram into stem-like cells and undergo a single asymmetric division to generate multi-potent retinal progenitors. Muller glia-derived progenitors then divide rapidly, numerically matching the magnitude of the cell death, and differentiate into the ablated neurons. Emerging evidence reveals that inflammation plays an essential role in this multi-step process of retinal regeneration. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the inflammatory events during retinal regeneration and highlights the mechanisms whereby inflammatory molecules regulate the quiescence and division of Muller glia, the proliferation of Muller glia-derived progenitors and the survival of regenerated neurons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据