4.6 Review

Genetic and Transcriptomic Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Current Situation and the Road Ahead

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10051030

关键词

Alzheimer’ s disease; Parkinson’ s disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; biomarkers; genetics; transcriptomics

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) [1ZIA-NS003154, Z01-AG000949-02, Z01-ES10198]
  2. Rosetrees Trust
  3. John Black Charitable Foundation
  4. University College London MBPhD Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurodegenerative diseases are complex and heterogeneous, making the discovery and validation of biomarkers challenging. Efforts to find genetic and transcriptomic indicators for disease diagnosis and treatment direction are ongoing and important. The next generation of biomarker studies show promise in implementing multi-modal approaches for large scale datasets, but require an open science framework for success.
Neurodegenerative diseases are etiologically and clinically heterogeneous conditions, often reflecting a spectrum of disease rather than well-defined disorders. The underlying molecular complexity of these diseases has made the discovery and validation of useful biomarkers challenging. The search of characteristic genetic and transcriptomic indicators for preclinical disease diagnosis, prognosis, or subtyping is an area of ongoing effort and interest. The next generation of biomarker studies holds promise by implementing meaningful longitudinal and multi-modal approaches in large scale biobank and healthcare system scale datasets. This work will only be possible in an open science framework. This review summarizes the current state of genetic and transcriptomic biomarkers in Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, providing a comprehensive landscape of recent literature and future directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据