4.6 Review

The Role of Macrophages in the Development of Acute and Chronic Inflammatory Lung Diseases

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10040897

关键词

macrophages; M1; M2 polarization; cytokines; acute; chronic inflammatory diseases

资金

  1. Korean Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Initiative Program [KGM5522113]
  2. Ministry of Health andWelfare [HI14C1277]
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [KGM5522113] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophages play a crucial role in the development of inflammatory lung diseases by secreting inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to promote the progression of acute or chronic inflammatory responses.
Macrophages play an important role in the innate and adaptive immune responses of organ systems, including the lungs, to particles and pathogens. Cumulative results show that macrophages contribute to the development and progression of acute or chronic inflammatory responses through the secretion of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and the activation of transcription factors in the pathogenesis of inflammatory lung diseases, such as acute lung injury (ALI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ARDS related to COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)), allergic asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This review summarizes the functions of macrophages and their associated underlying mechanisms in the development of ALI, ARDS, COVID-19-related ARDS, allergic asthma, COPD, and IPF and briefly introduces the acute and chronic experimental animal models. Thus, this review suggests an effective therapeutic approach that focuses on the regulation of macrophage function in the context of inflammatory lung diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据