4.6 Article

Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of the Biological Activity of Leonotis nepetifolia (L.) R. Br Transformed Roots Extracts Obtained through Rhizobium rhizogenes-Mediated Transformation

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10051242

关键词

Leonotis nepetifolia; hairy roots; Rhizobium rhizogenes transformation; cytotoxic activity; ROS levels; DNA repair and protective effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is the first to establish transformed root cultures of Leonotis nepetifolia, and reveals differences in compound content between transformed and nontransformed roots. Biological studies show that LNTR4 root extract exhibits cytotoxic effects on multiple cancer cell lines, indicating its potential as an effective and affordable source of bioactive secondary metabolites for further exploration.
According to the present knowledge, this is the first report on establishing transformed root cultures of Leonotis nepetifolia after Rhizobium rhizogenes-mediated transformation. The preliminary phytochemical analysis showed differences in the content of phenols and flavonoids in transformed and nontransformed roots. The dominant compounds in the analyzed extracts were (+)-catechin (5464 and 6808 mu g/g DW), p-coumaric acid (2549 and 4907 mu g/g DW), m-coumaric acid (1508 and 2048 mu g/g DW) and rosmarinic acid (1844 and 2643 mu g/g DW) for nontransformed (LNNR) and transformed (LNTR4) roots, respectively. Initial biological studies carried out on LNNR, and LNTR4 extracts showed a cytotoxic effect on the A549 lung, HCC1937 breast and leukemia NALM-6 cell lines, antioxidants, as well as repair and protection against DNA damage induced by H2O2 in HUVEC cells. Due to the stronger effect of the LNTR4 root extract, which can be a relatively efficient and cheap source of bioactive secondary metabolites, further biological analyses are needed to discover in detail their potentially valuable biological properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据