4.6 Review

Molecular Chaperones in Osteosarcoma: Diagnosis and Therapeutic Issues

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10040754

关键词

osteosarcoma; bone tumor; HSPs; HSF1

资金

  1. La ligue contre le cancer
  2. Federation Enfants et Sante, et la Societe Francaise de lutte contre les Cancers et leucemies de l'enfant et de l'adolescent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteosarcoma is the most common form of primary bone tumor affecting children and young adults, with a 5-year survival rate of 70%. Heat Shock Proteins play a significant role in cell proliferation, apoptosis inhibition, migration, and drug resistance in osteosarcoma. By studying HSP27, HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90, they can serve as potential clinical uses in osteosarcoma.
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common form of primary bone tumor affecting mainly children and young adults. Despite therapeutic progress, the 5-year survival rate is 70%, but it drops drastically to 30% for poor responders to therapies or for patients with metastases. Identifying new therapeutic targets is thus essential. Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) are the main effectors of Heat Shock Response (HSR), the expression of which is induced by stressors. HSPs are a large family of proteins involved in the folding and maturation of other proteins in order to maintain proteostasis. HSP overexpression is observed in many cancers, including breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, and ovarian, as well as OS. In this article we reviewed the significant role played by HSPs in molecular mechanisms leading to OS development and progression. HSPs are directly involved in OS cell proliferation, apoptosis inhibition, migration, and drug resistance. We focused on HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90 and summarized their potential clinical uses in OS as either biomarkers for diagnosis or therapeutic targets. Finally, based on different types of cancer, we consider the advantage of targeting heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), the major transcriptional regulator of HSPs in OS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据