Clinical Implications of Geometric and Dosimetric Uncertainties of Inter- and Intra-Fractional Movement during Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Breast Cancer Patients

Simple Summary Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality for breast cancer. Compared to conventional radiotherapy techniques, modern radiotherapy with fewer fractions and smaller target volumes requires higher accuracy. Image-guidance using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most common methods used for positional verification before treatment. This study reports geometric and dosimetric outcomes evaluated by analyzing CBCT images acquired before and during treatments. The positional change and internal movement of the patient were less than 1 cm in most cases without significant deviation in the dosimetric parameters of interest. However, there were cases involving extreme variation, which resulted in insufficient radiation delivered to the target areas and increased radiation exposure to adjacent normal organs. The results of the current study suggest that unexpected intra-fractional motion may occur, prompting for marginal adaptation in selected patients who are deemed to suffer from this kind of event. With the introduction of modern sophisticated radiotherapy (RT) techniques, the significance of accuracy has increased considerably. This study evaluated the necessity of pre-treatment and intra-fractional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) by analyzing inter- and intra-fractional CBCT images of breast cancer patients receiving RT. From 57 patients, 1206 pre-treatment CBCT and 1067 intra-fractional CBCT images were collected. Geometric movements of patients were measured quantitively in both inter- and intra-fractional CBCT, and changes in dosimetric parameters were evaluated in selected patients with extreme intra-fractional movement. For right-sided breast cancer patients, left-sided breast cancer patients treated using deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH), and left-sided breast cancer patients treated using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), median inter-fractional deviations were 0.53 (range 0.06-2.98) cm, 0.66 (range 0.08-4.41) cm, and 0.69 (range 0.04-3.80) cm, and median intra-fractional deviations were 0.14 (range 0.00-0.62) cm, 0.23 (range 0.02-0.96) cm, and 0.24 (0.00-1.15) cm, respectively. Modified plans reflecting large changes in intra-fractional position in 10 selected cases revealed insufficient target coverage in seven cases and more than 20-fold increase in the volume of heart receiving at least 25 Gy in two cases. Intra-fractional verification, as well as pre-treatment verification, might be considered in patients using DIBH or CPAP.

Automated summary

Radiotherapy is crucial in breast cancer treatment, and modern techniques require higher accuracy. This study evaluated the necessity of pre-treatment and intra-fractional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for verifying patient position. Most patients had minimal positional changes, but adjustments were needed for cases with extreme intra-fractional movement to ensure target coverage.